When knowledge is too much
I observe that the volume of knowledge stops being something you can hold. Streams grow faster than you can analyze them, and the usual reliance on sequential study no longer works. You end up accepting facts before you have time to understand them. The inner picture of the world no longer rests on proofs but on the coherence you can keep while the information pressure builds. Increasingly, the form of delivering knowledge matters more than the fullness of its contents: layering, multiple levels of detail, and respect for attention let ideas land without overload. In that environment, plausibility is defined not by truth but by resonance. That is why I structure my texts through AFKP, and the full article in Russian published on Habr expands on the idea and shows how the perception model changes when knowledge overflows.